Public-records reference siteLast updated August 31, 2026
Filed complaint — allegations only

Justin Casequin — Minnesota litigation

CourtDistrict Court, Fourth Judicial District, Hennepin County, Minnesota Case27-CV-26-8795 DocumentVerified Complaint FiledMay 15, 2026 at 3:49 PM

What the filed record establishes

The court-filed verified complaint expressly identifies Justin Casequin as a defendant.

The pleading states that Casequin previously worked with Evolve Construction and describes his role as including commercial sales, sales management, operations, business development, sales-team development and operational leadership.

Procedural distinctionThe filing establishes that these allegations were made in court. It does not establish that the allegations are true or that Justin Casequin is liable.
Open filed complaint PDF

Justin-specific allegations summarized

  • The complaint alleges improper competition involving leads or client identities and alleges disclosure of confidential business information.
  • It alleges Casequin intentionally communicated with Evolve clients in an effort to interfere with client contracts for personal or corporate financial benefit.
  • It alleges Casequin and others caused or contributed to clients attempting to breach, or actually breaching, contracts with Evolve.
  • It alleges Evolve discovered Casequin working with a competing roofing company while he was still working with Evolve.
  • It alleges Casequin participated in efforts to divert personnel, leads, homeowners or contractors toward competing businesses.
  • It further alleges Casequin helped create and distribute a diss track and later sent it to Evolve sales representatives with the intent to cause them to leave the company.

Each item above is attributed to the complaint. None is presented here as a judicial finding.

Claims that expressly encompass Justin Casequin

The complaint expressly includes Justin Casequin in the rights-of-publicity count and the tortious-interference-with-prospective-economic-advantage count. It also pleads commercial/product disparagement and civil conspiracy against all defendants.

This page does not attribute every cause of action in the complaint to Justin. In particular, claims whose count headings do not name him are not presented here as Justin-specific claims.

Update protocol

If the court dismisses claims, enters an injunction, grants summary judgment, enters final judgment, approves a settlement, or otherwise materially changes Justin Casequin's status in the case, the adjudicated result should be added promptly.

A filed complaint documents allegations. A court order documents what the court actually decided.